Newsweek’s Gay Halo Obama

facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

Graphic: Newsweek’s Gay Halo Obama

Newsweek declares, “President Obama is The First Gay President” after Obama announced his support for Gay Marriage. Romney declared that he believes marriage is between one man and one woman.

With one little photo shop gay halo, Newsweek has managed to offend just about everyone in the US except perhaps the 1% US gay community.* Perhaps Newsweek’s Gay Halo Obama has offended some of the gay community too. Not only is Obama our Savior, but as Newsweek graphically displays,  he is also our Gay Savior. Salvation comes in the form of a recently declared gay president.

Newsweek, I have a news alert for you, Obama is neither our savior nor is he gay.

The absurdity is that Newsweek puts the Gay Halo Obama, a heterosexual, father of 2 young girls on it’s cover. The message it sends conflicts with all major religions in the United States. By embracing one community he is offending the larger religious community.  I agree with Mitt, “People of different faiths, like yours and mine, sometimes wonder where we can meet in common purpose, when there are so many differences in creed and theology.”

Why would Obama do this? Sure he is trying to appeal to liberals, but he already has that group on board. No help there. As for the black community, he may have hurt himself since many blacks are religious. So why would Obama take such a gamble this time when he was successful at not being gay last election? Well Andrew Sullivan sums it up rather nicely here:

‘He had to discover his black identity and then reconcile it with his white family, just as gays discover their homosexual identity and then have to reconcile it with their heterosexual family,’ The Daily Beast blogger, Andrew Sullivan wrote, describing the similarities between Mr Obama and the gay community.


Photo: Little guy Daily Beast blogger Andrew Sullivan with his husband.

What about the other 99% of us? What do we have to reconcile with our God (or no God) and our Enlightened leader god?

Newsweek is not news. It’s politics of the worst kind, a one sided propaganda machine. Fact is, the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all the civil liberties can be afforded to gay couples in many states.

This is a state decision not a federal one. And the financially troubled Newsweek is only trying to help Obama distract voters from the true problems in America, namely the economy. In acuality the financially troubled liberal Newsweek rag hurt the financially troubled presidency with it’s absurdly outrageous Gay Halo Obama cover. And all I can say is …. Thanks Newsweek!

 

 

* The 2000 U.S. Census Bureau found that homosexual couples constitute less than 1% of American households.

Is the MSM Starting a Race War for Obama?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon,” Obama said in his first comments about the shooting, acknowledging the racial element in the case. Now we’ve got the President influencing public opinion, before the facts are in.

“More than 25,000 were expected to attend an afternoon rally in Sanford, Fla. for Martin, including the Rev. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and other civil rights leaders.” The media is responsible for all of this. They didn’t have the facts but that didn’t stop them from speculating. They encouraged the lynch mob mentality and the hate. The President again steps in without having all the facts and inflames the situation. Why aren’t Jackson and Sharpton in Kansas City where 2 black 16 year old guys followed a 13 year old white boy home 2 weeks ago, poured gasoline on him and set him on fire?

The New Black Panthers have stated on public television they are offering a $10,000 reward for the capture of George Zimmerman. Isn’t that illegal? Where are the CNN news reports on that?

Speaking of CNN, according to a CNN poll released Monday, 73 percent of Americans think police should arrest Zimmerman.

When will the headline read.”Zimmerman shoots teen thug in self defense“? Never… why? Because that’s not news. And it certainly doesn’t help Obama with his latest obvious attempt to divide the nation.

There is no justice in this country when it comes to the media. You are convicted by public opinion often with the media creating a story without all the facts.

I heard a demonstrator say that this event was “fueled by capitalism and justified by racism.” Trayvon is just a propaganda opportunity.

Has anyone every heard of a “White Hispanic” before until this story? Did you ever notice how they try to bring out the “White” side of a bi-racial person when he is accused of wrongdoing? Did you notice that the MSM never call the President bi-racial? Obama was raised by the “White” side of his family, yet he is our first ‘black president.’

Funny how some of the Trayvon protesters are walking around with shirts that say “Kill the Cracker.” Funny how nobody finds that offensive in the media.

What I find almost unbelievable is that the black community across this nation has already judged and convicted Zimmerman. At the same time the black community accepts black on black murder every day.

Trayvon’s mom, Sybrina Fulton is seeking to make money off her son’s death. She has applied for trademarks for the phrases “I Am Trayvon” and “Justice for Trayvon,” according to filings made last week with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In both instances, Fulton, 46, is seeking the trademarks for use on “Digital materials, namely, CDs and DVDs featuring Trayvon Martin,” and other products. In the words of Rahm Emanuel, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” I think Sybrina got the message.

The original report made it sound like Zimmerman immediately pulled a gun on Martin, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. If the gun didn’t come into play until after Zimmerman had been knocked to the ground with one punch and then had his head bashed in, then it’s a completely different story.

The MSM is committing criminal acts in this country. This is a dangerous kind of race-baiting propaganda. Looking at the Facebook photo of this thug….No wonder they’ve been showing his grade school photo all these days. They purposely spun this. Trevon was 6’2″ and over 200 pounds.

What is at the heart of this story is “irresponsible journalism”. Again the Media has proved once again that they are judge, jury and executioner in a public forum. They’ve whipped the public into a frenzy and the truth is now shrouded with half-truths and inuendo.

What ever happened to just reporting the facts?

Can Obama Really Control Gas Prices?

facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

gas pricesI don’t know if you have noticed or not, but gas prices are on the rise yet again. There was a time, not more than a few months ago, when gas was getting as low as $2.98 a gallon. Now those times have changed with prices back up to nearly $4 in most areas and even higher in others. Lots of citizens are fuming over the rates and they want answers.

Many people are blaming Obama for the prices. They’re not so much accusing him of raising them but of not doing anything to decrease them. According to a recent poll conducted by CBS and the New York Times, 54% of respondents believe that Obama can do a lot to control gas prices. What’s more is that nearly two-thirds of the respondents to an ABC and Washington Post poll disapprove of Obama’s handling of the situation.

The people have good reason to blame the Obama administration as well, due to the fact that Obama criticized former President George W. Bush over the exact same issue when he campaigned in 2008. According to a statement from Obama to a crowd in Ohio, “You’re paying nearly $3.70 a gallon for gas – 2 1/2 times what it cost when President Bush took office.” Obviously not much has changed, has it?

However, most analysts don’t blame Obama for the increase in gas prices but instead say that rising tension with Iran is the primary factor. The rising tension is making traders nervous about a possible conflict in a crucial oil-producing region. If conflict does break out in Iran then a significant source of the world’s oil would be cut off.

Increased prices may also stem from the fact that Japan has been using increasingly more amounts of the “black gold” since shutting down nearly all of the country’s nuclear power plants after the Fukushima disaster last year. In addition to that, conflicts in countries like Sudan, Yemen, Syria and Libya have halted oil production from those countries.

Republicans believe that more domestic drilling the United States would help decrease prices. Gingrich says, if elected, that he has a plan to reduce gas prices to as low as $2.50 a gallon. However, citizens want immediate results and any plan to reduce gas prices, whether from domestic drilling or forcing automakers to make more fuel-efficient vehicles, would take years to go into effect.

The Democrats have a different theory in that greedy Wall Street speculators are driving up prices in order to make some quick profits. The Dems also believe that the Obama administration could help lower gas prices by cracking down on this, though even if it were true, most experts believe that global oil markets are too big for any regulators to police.

The absolute last option would be for Obama to dip into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. This was done back in 1991 during the first Iraq war, right after Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and then again last year by Obama himself during Libya’s civil war. However, this would only be a temporary relief.

This definitely looks very bad for Obama and his administration, especially considering the fact that in both the CBS and New York Times poll and the ABC and Washington Post poll Obama saw drastic decreases in his overall approval rating. The silver lining is, for Obama at least, that oil/gas prices on their own don’t do much in determining a presidential election, according to the New York Times’ stat specialist Nate Silver.

However, rising gas prices would definitely hurt our economic recovery by giving Americans less money in their pockets. As a result, consumer spending would decrease and the economy would get worse, something everybody, Democrats and Republicans alike, would most definitely blame Obama for.

Source: Yahoo! – High gas prices: How much can Obama (or Gingrich) do?

A Tech Travel Agent can get a laptop rental to you within 24 business hours in over 1000 cities worldwide. Call Me Toll Free 800-736-8772

America’s Economy Gets Worse While Obama Vacations in Martha’s Vineyard

facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

Obama in Martha's VineyardI don’t think anybody would disagree with the fact that running our country isn’t exactly the easiest of jobs. Having that much responsibility, pressure and criticism on your plate each and every day would take its toll on even the most strong willed people. That being said, I think don’t think it is entirely unreasonable for our country’s president to take a vacation every now and then.

If I was the leader of one of the world’s biggest superpowers, I would probably want a few days to relax myself, though I do not think I would do it quite like Barack Obama and family are doing it as Obama, his family and entourage have just set off for a 10-day vacation to the lavish and ritzy Martha’s Vineyard.

Obama’s annual vacation to the fancy island is already facing major scrutiny from politicians and citizens, and he’s barely unpacked yet. Republicans are criticizing Obama for taking time off when our country is in one of the worst times of economic turmoil ever as well as choosing the lavish island of Martha’s Vineyard to do so.

Mitt Romney, former Massachusetts Governor, has slammed Obama for “vacationing in Martha’s Vineyard” as opposed to working to create jobs in the country. However, despite all the barbs and jabs thrown at him, Obama seems unconcerned. Obama has been criticized for vacationing at Martha’s Vineyard for the last two summers with no long-term political repercussions.

However, the extreme struggles of our country’s economy, along with a rapidly fluctuating stock market make the optics of Obama’s vacation a little more complicated. A similar situation faced former President Bill Clinton back in 1995. Back then, Clinton decided not to go to his typical vacation spot at Martha’s Vineyard, instead opting for a 5-day trip to Wyoming.

However, after Clinton was re-elected in 1996, he began returning to Martha’s Vineyard. Obama, on the other hand, has no intentions of doing anything remotely close to that. It is no surprise that Obama and his family will try their hardest to stay out of the media’s eye. Obama doesn’t want any photo being leaked that would show Obama being out of touch with average Americans.

I’m all for the president taking a vacation, I mean, he doesn’t exactly have the easiest of jobs. What I do have a problem with is the location of said vacation. Martha’s Vineyard is definitely a vacation getaway for the rich and famous. With the absolute disarray that our economy is currently in, it doesn’t quite seem fair that Obama gets to vacation in Martha’s Vineyard while the rest of the country has to deal with the threat of unemployment, debt and other economic woes. As somebody who campaigned as a supporter of the average, middle-class American, Obama certainly doesn’t act like one.

Source: Yahoo! News – The Fast Fix: Obama on break?

Security Camera Solutions

Absurd Time: Obama has a Crush on Reagan

facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

Obama ReaganIt is written in the Absurd Time article that,

“..Obama was clearly impressed by the way Reagan had transformed Americans’ attitude about government”

Obama shared his impressions on a presidential historian ‘working supper’ guests, whom he had shared his attitudes on other presidents including: Lincoln against his ‘team of rivals’ and Kennedy’s Camelot.

Clearly, it was what Reagan was able to do with the minds of most Americans that most impresses President Obama. Obama wants to do that trick before his term ends. If cutting taxes and spending is a means to control attitudes of the average American, then Obama will give it a go. At least symbolically.

Obama was acting like Reagan during his State of the Union address.  As President Obama stood before the congress he spoke of freezing spending and federal salaries. He spoke of simplifying the tax code and cutting defense spending. Well 3 our of 4 ain’t too bad.

Obama stated in the State of the Union speech:

“Let us, in these next two years — men and women of both parties, every political shade — concentrate on the long-range, bipartisan responsibilities of government,”

Reagan said in his 1983 State of the Union, “not the short-range or short-term temptations of partisan politics.”

Since the November election Obama has move to the right. Obama has brought CEO for meetings in the white house. He had not done that during his first two years as president. The war between Obama and the US Chamber of Commerce is over. And Obama extended the Bush Tax cuts, which I am sure is making the gipper smile.

But is this the New Obama? The media is giving a wide berth on his new found Reaganesqueness. Or were these moves and actions just to throw the Reaganistas a bone?

The left wing media HATES Reaganomics. Its all a big joke. Cutting taxes will never work, making government smaller to fix social ills, what are you thinking? We need big government programs and spending to make jobs. Unemployment creates jobs you know.

Reaganomics is no joke. Its a serious idea that works to restore the vitally important social and economic values in our society. Reaganomics requires every man and woman to be responsible for themselves and their loved ones. There are four pillars of Regan’s economic philosphy:

  1. Reduce government spending,
  2. Reduce income and capital gains marginal tax rates,
  3. Reduce government regulation,
  4. Control the money supply to reduce inflation.

reaganomics

The absurd media doesn’t believe in supply side, trickle down economics. So what’s the opposite of social and economic responsibility and self empowerment?

Reagan might be gone, but he is not forgotten. Happy 100 Ronnie!

Dayton Tea Party Protester

A Tech Travel Agent can get a laptop rental to you within 24 business hours in over 1000 cities worldwide. Call 800-736-8772

We have 3987 Installers, Technicians and Engineers stationed in nearly 1000 locations worldwide to serve you.

Matthews: "Dude, I totally almost forgot Obama was black for an hour!"

facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

Yeah…I’m sorry folks but it’s another beautiful reminder of why we all love laugh at Chris Matthews. This guy…I mean…seriously…wow…I am nearly speechless, like Obama without his trusty teleprompter. (ba-da-dum)

Via: Snark and Boobs

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_v_IOCSsQM&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1]

Matthews is THAT guy, you know the one, the one who says “I’m not racist, I had a black friend in college.” That’s totally who Chris Matthews is.

Olbermann’s lead was about how Obama was talking to Americans…not congress, and suddenly Crazy Chris spins it into this post-racial rant, which is really just bottom line racist, in my opinion. I think most Americans, and correct me if I’m wrong, don’t view Obama as some Black Dude in the White House, he’s just a Dude in the White House, messing things up like most of the other Dudes that came before him.

His race has nothing to do with his inability to lead, Jimmy Cater was white AND a peanut farmer and he was terrible too. Does that mean I’m a peanutist? No, I’m eating peanut M&M’s right now. Oh wait, I think I just pulled a Matthews…lemme call the ACLU quick to make sure I didn’t offend anyone. I’ll get back to you guys on the status of my peanutism.

“I was watching, I say, wait a minute, he’s an African-American guy in front of a bunch of other white people. And here he is President of the United States, and we’ve completely forgotten that tonight.”

Dear Crazy Chris, isn’t post-racial America SUPPOSED to forget he’s black? Isn’t post-racial America suppose to see past the color of one’s skin and look at the content of their character? No? Really? I could have sworn that’s what Martin Luther King Jr. would have wanted. Damn public schools! Again, I’ve apparently been misinformed.

Well, keep trying little buddy, one of these days you’ll get it.

(The ACLU called me back and said I’m not a peanutist, and they’re charging me a $15 “am I an -ist or not?” service fee. Totally worth the money!)