White House Correspondent Dinner Fight

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

ABCs Martha Raddatz says it is a fun night.

Tom Brokaw says it has become a narcissistic event.

White House correspondents, like Cindi Lauper, just want to have fun. That’s all they really want, Some fun, When the working day is done, […] – they want to have fun.

Tom Brokaw says, What kind of image do we present to the rest of the country? Are we doing their business, or are we just a group of narcissists who are mostly interested in elevating our own profiles? And what comes through the screen on C-SPAN that night is the latter and not the former.

Ryan Williams says, Tom is obviously entitled to his opinion…

Brokaw says It’s always a fun gathering, but work could be done.

Gayle King says, …it’s a great time for Hollywood and Washington to sort of come together.

Brokaw says, Somewhere along the line, it [the White House Correspondent Dinner] began to spin out of control.

David Remick says, If one party can corrupt you, he said. You probably shouldn’t be in the game.

Brokaw says, It became more a tabloid kind of dinner.

Kathleen Sebelius disagrees, she says, …there are lots of dinners in Washington, there are lots of events but this is always a best of it, fun weekend because people don’t take themselves very seriously. That’s always a good time.

Brokaw says, I was kind of embarrassed [when I used to go] because there was sophomoric humor, and a lot of people were drinking way too much!

Brokaw says, Lindsay Lohan was the breaking point.

An unnamed editorialist at the Washington Post says Lohan was the breaking point . . . and not Ozzy Osbourne, Paula Jones, Larry Flynt or Donald Trump?

The Newsweak Wimp Absurdity

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

Newsweek continues its highly biased political agenda. As you may recall last May Newsweek declared  “President Obama is The First Gay President” after Obama announced his support for Gay Marriage. With one little photo shop gay halo, Newsweek managed to offend just about everyone in the US except perhaps the 1% US gay community.*

Now Newsweek asks the question of Obama’s Presidential opponent, Is he [Romney] too insecure to be president? Again Newsweek proves it is not news. It’s politics of the worst kind, a one sided propaganda machine.

Which is it Wimp or Bully?
This time Newsweak is in conflict with most of the left who refer to Romney as a bully. Romney has been portrayed as a “bully” for allegedly cutting the hair of a boy in grade school, and Obama adviser Robert Gibbs just called Romney to a “prep school bully” this past Sunday.

Yet DNC Chairwoman, Debbie Sasserman-Schultz agrees she had this to say regarding Romney, “The Whimp:”

“Well, I think Mitt Romney has demonstrated repeatedly he has a penchant for– for secrecy, doesn’t seem to have any interest in actually showing the American people his– his finances, decision– important decisions about his investments, refuses to come clean on ….”  Credit: The Blaze

How does Mitt Romney feel? Romney says that he isn’t sweating the upcoming Newsweek magazine cover. He says the media tried a similar criticism of President George H.W. Bush. Romney says Bush “was a pretty great president” who was not a wimp. In fact a 1987 Newsweek profile featured a profile of then-Vice President Bush with the title — “Fighting the ‘WimpFactor.’

How does left wing bias work for Newsweek? If you consider print distribution, not so good. Last week, Newsweek announced that it due to poor readership it can no longer afford to produce the printed version of its rag-o-zine. The owners of Newsweek says in order to reduce costs, the magazine will shift to online only in September. It has been widely reported by real news sources that Newsweek has been losing money the past decade and is completely BROKE.

Additional Left Wing Newsweek Bias:

Another example of Newsweek bias, Michelle Backman is framed as a ‘right-wing’ crazy in their August 2011 photo.

Lets not forget the wonderful Palin covers:

What Difference a Day Makes

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

By Guest Blogger Beth Pepoy

Back in high school I remember watching how quickly my peers elevated each other to popularity only to take it away the next day because that one individual failed to go along with the group.  The cycle would repeat itself regularly.  Daunting and contrite these certain individuals that formed this unique bond of endless unity often enjoyed casting stones at those whom differ from them, and laughed at their own malicious fodder.

On rare occasion that lone individual would do something that the whole school was talking about and would find themselves thrust into a prime seat at the lunch table.  Somehow over the weekend that somebody would be thrown off the island and once again exiled from the great lunch table of the chosen.

On June 27, 2012 Chris Matthews was exercising his right (sorry I mean left) to call Chief Justice Roberts; Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, whom in March 1857 delivered the opinion of the Supreme Court to rule against the plaintiff Dred Scott and concluded he was never free but still indeed a slave (click here, for an over view on Dred Scott vs. Sanford) (Click here for the actual text of the case).

The comparison would be baffling if you never watched Matthews or MSNBC, or irrelevant if you had forgotten the Dred Scott Decision all together.  Perhaps, this why Matthews and those alike continue to run their opinions as if they are actually fact based instead of their version of it and continue to lose viewers.

To see the supercilious absurdity in action watch this:


Not only does Matthews go beyond the media bias for all things left of center he also fails to realize that Chief Justice Taney was a democrat.

But wait there’s more!!

On June 28, 2012 Matthews declares Chief Justice Roberts a hero!  What? Huh? Why? Simple; Chief Justice Roberts appeared to rule in favor of Obamacare, thus garnering a seat at Matthew’s lunch table. Don’t believe me?  Just click the link below and watch for yourself.


While the opinions may vary on the Chief Justice’s decision to vote with the more liberal justices and alienating the conservatives. There may in all probability more to the actual story then what Matthews defines as heroic, I encourage anyone to read varying viewpoints and not let media bias determine it for you (click here and click here for examples).

In one day according to the ever refutable Matthews–Chief Justice Roberts has gone from zero to hero in 24 hours. Regardless of the ruling Matthews’s display of willful contempt one day to the hailing of the Chief Justice the next was yet another blatant display of media bias.

What will happen when the Chief Justice no longer appears to sides with the liberals of the Supreme Court Justices?   How will Matthews and others of his bias react then? As rhetorical as these questions are, one would venture to ask just one more.

When will Matthews’ get thrown off the island and be replaced at the lunch table?


About the author: Beth Pepoy has written several published articles for Yahoo Voices and for Yahoo News. She has been featured on the website PolitiJim’s Rants for Reasonable People, and has been published on several on line newspapers including Redeye Daily.

She currently blogs on her own site: http://runinmystocking.wordpress.com
Beth resides in Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Follow Beth on twitter: http://twitter.com/bpepoy or @bpepoy

References: Dred Scott Decision: Original Works by Joe Ryan @ AmericanCivilWar.com
Mrctv.org articles by Scott Whitlock
Slate.com article by Tom Scocca
Forbes.com article by guest blog Veta T. Richardson

Newsweek’s Gay Halo Obama

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

Graphic: Newsweek’s Gay Halo Obama

Newsweek declares, “President Obama is The First Gay President” after Obama announced his support for Gay Marriage. Romney declared that he believes marriage is between one man and one woman.

With one little photo shop gay halo, Newsweek has managed to offend just about everyone in the US except perhaps the 1% US gay community.* Perhaps Newsweek’s Gay Halo Obama has offended some of the gay community too. Not only is Obama our Savior, but as Newsweek graphically displays,  he is also our Gay Savior. Salvation comes in the form of a recently declared gay president.

Newsweek, I have a news alert for you, Obama is neither our savior nor is he gay.

The absurdity is that Newsweek puts the Gay Halo Obama, a heterosexual, father of 2 young girls on it’s cover. The message it sends conflicts with all major religions in the United States. By embracing one community he is offending the larger religious community.  I agree with Mitt, “People of different faiths, like yours and mine, sometimes wonder where we can meet in common purpose, when there are so many differences in creed and theology.”

Why would Obama do this? Sure he is trying to appeal to liberals, but he already has that group on board. No help there. As for the black community, he may have hurt himself since many blacks are religious. So why would Obama take such a gamble this time when he was successful at not being gay last election? Well Andrew Sullivan sums it up rather nicely here:

‘He had to discover his black identity and then reconcile it with his white family, just as gays discover their homosexual identity and then have to reconcile it with their heterosexual family,’ The Daily Beast blogger, Andrew Sullivan wrote, describing the similarities between Mr Obama and the gay community.

Photo: Little guy Daily Beast blogger Andrew Sullivan with his husband.

What about the other 99% of us? What do we have to reconcile with our God (or no God) and our Enlightened leader god?

Newsweek is not news. It’s politics of the worst kind, a one sided propaganda machine. Fact is, the same exact rights, all the civil rights, all the civil liberties can be afforded to gay couples in many states.

This is a state decision not a federal one. And the financially troubled Newsweek is only trying to help Obama distract voters from the true problems in America, namely the economy. In acuality the financially troubled liberal Newsweek rag hurt the financially troubled presidency with it’s absurdly outrageous Gay Halo Obama cover. And all I can say is …. Thanks Newsweek!



* The 2000 U.S. Census Bureau found that homosexual couples constitute less than 1% of American households.

Is the MSM Starting a Race War for Obama?

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

“If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon,” Obama said in his first comments about the shooting, acknowledging the racial element in the case. Now we’ve got the President influencing public opinion, before the facts are in.

“More than 25,000 were expected to attend an afternoon rally in Sanford, Fla. for Martin, including the Rev. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and other civil rights leaders.” The media is responsible for all of this. They didn’t have the facts but that didn’t stop them from speculating. They encouraged the lynch mob mentality and the hate. The President again steps in without having all the facts and inflames the situation. Why aren’t Jackson and Sharpton in Kansas City where 2 black 16 year old guys followed a 13 year old white boy home 2 weeks ago, poured gasoline on him and set him on fire?

The New Black Panthers have stated on public television they are offering a $10,000 reward for the capture of George Zimmerman. Isn’t that illegal? Where are the CNN news reports on that?

Speaking of CNN, according to a CNN poll released Monday, 73 percent of Americans think police should arrest Zimmerman.

When will the headline read.”Zimmerman shoots teen thug in self defense“? Never… why? Because that’s not news. And it certainly doesn’t help Obama with his latest obvious attempt to divide the nation.

There is no justice in this country when it comes to the media. You are convicted by public opinion often with the media creating a story without all the facts.

I heard a demonstrator say that this event was “fueled by capitalism and justified by racism.” Trayvon is just a propaganda opportunity.

Has anyone every heard of a “White Hispanic” before until this story? Did you ever notice how they try to bring out the “White” side of a bi-racial person when he is accused of wrongdoing? Did you notice that the MSM never call the President bi-racial? Obama was raised by the “White” side of his family, yet he is our first ‘black president.’

Funny how some of the Trayvon protesters are walking around with shirts that say “Kill the Cracker.” Funny how nobody finds that offensive in the media.

What I find almost unbelievable is that the black community across this nation has already judged and convicted Zimmerman. At the same time the black community accepts black on black murder every day.

Trayvon’s mom, Sybrina Fulton is seeking to make money off her son’s death. She has applied for trademarks for the phrases “I Am Trayvon” and “Justice for Trayvon,” according to filings made last week with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. In both instances, Fulton, 46, is seeking the trademarks for use on “Digital materials, namely, CDs and DVDs featuring Trayvon Martin,” and other products. In the words of Rahm Emanuel, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” I think Sybrina got the message.

The original report made it sound like Zimmerman immediately pulled a gun on Martin, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. If the gun didn’t come into play until after Zimmerman had been knocked to the ground with one punch and then had his head bashed in, then it’s a completely different story.

The MSM is committing criminal acts in this country. This is a dangerous kind of race-baiting propaganda. Looking at the Facebook photo of this thug….No wonder they’ve been showing his grade school photo all these days. They purposely spun this. Trevon was 6’2″ and over 200 pounds.

What is at the heart of this story is “irresponsible journalism”. Again the Media has proved once again that they are judge, jury and executioner in a public forum. They’ve whipped the public into a frenzy and the truth is now shrouded with half-truths and inuendo.

What ever happened to just reporting the facts?

Flea Party Hate & Violence vs. Tea Party Singing

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

How does the media miss the Hate Speech and Violence of the Wall Street Protestors?

Ann Coulter calls the mob the “Wingless, Bloodsucking and Parasitic: Meet the Flea Party

Here’s one of the hate speak protesters Reason.tv spoke to at Occupy Wall Street in Los Angeles on October 12, 2011.

She identifies herself as Patricia McAllister and as an employee of Los Angeles Unified School District. “I think that the Zionist Jews, who are running these big banks and our Federal Reserve, which is not run by the federal government… they need to be run out of this country,” she said.

Here’s some violence. Journalist and Reason contributor Michael Tracey is covering New York’s Occupy Wall Street as it’s happening. Above is footage he shot as the protesters marched through the street of Manhattan and had various stand-offs with the New York Police Department. Tracey himself reports being punched in the shoulder while filming.

In the above video, around the 1.40 mark, a white-shirted NYPD officer decks a protester in a green shirt (how the incident started is unclear). Reason.tv’s Meredith Bragg edited the video above from about 20 minutes of footage.

More Violent protesters.

Now contrast that with peaceful Tea Party Protesters.

I cannot understand how the media can be co blatantly biased by not condemning the hate and violence from the Fleas. The above video was typical of the protests that happened all across america. Tea parties picked up after themselves, there was no violent police confrontation and above all the sang together “God Bless America”. Something the Flea Party will never do!!!!

I support the Fleas First Amendment right to protest and party, but not to hate and hurt.

God Bless America and the Flea Party’s right to stink like a dead skunk in the middle of the road.

Absurd Time: Obama has a Crush on Reagan

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

Obama ReaganIt is written in the Absurd Time article that,

“..Obama was clearly impressed by the way Reagan had transformed Americans’ attitude about government”

Obama shared his impressions on a presidential historian ‘working supper’ guests, whom he had shared his attitudes on other presidents including: Lincoln against his ‘team of rivals’ and Kennedy’s Camelot.

Clearly, it was what Reagan was able to do with the minds of most Americans that most impresses President Obama. Obama wants to do that trick before his term ends. If cutting taxes and spending is a means to control attitudes of the average American, then Obama will give it a go. At least symbolically.

Obama was acting like Reagan during his State of the Union address.  As President Obama stood before the congress he spoke of freezing spending and federal salaries. He spoke of simplifying the tax code and cutting defense spending. Well 3 our of 4 ain’t too bad.

Obama stated in the State of the Union speech:

“Let us, in these next two years — men and women of both parties, every political shade — concentrate on the long-range, bipartisan responsibilities of government,”

Reagan said in his 1983 State of the Union, “not the short-range or short-term temptations of partisan politics.”

Since the November election Obama has move to the right. Obama has brought CEO for meetings in the white house. He had not done that during his first two years as president. The war between Obama and the US Chamber of Commerce is over. And Obama extended the Bush Tax cuts, which I am sure is making the gipper smile.

But is this the New Obama? The media is giving a wide berth on his new found Reaganesqueness. Or were these moves and actions just to throw the Reaganistas a bone?

The left wing media HATES Reaganomics. Its all a big joke. Cutting taxes will never work, making government smaller to fix social ills, what are you thinking? We need big government programs and spending to make jobs. Unemployment creates jobs you know.

Reaganomics is no joke. Its a serious idea that works to restore the vitally important social and economic values in our society. Reaganomics requires every man and woman to be responsible for themselves and their loved ones. There are four pillars of Regan’s economic philosphy:

  1. Reduce government spending,
  2. Reduce income and capital gains marginal tax rates,
  3. Reduce government regulation,
  4. Control the money supply to reduce inflation.


The absurd media doesn’t believe in supply side, trickle down economics. So what’s the opposite of social and economic responsibility and self empowerment?

Reagan might be gone, but he is not forgotten. Happy 100 Ronnie!

Dayton Tea Party Protester

A Tech Travel Agent can get a laptop rental to you within 24 business hours in over 1000 cities worldwide. Call 800-736-8772

We have 3987 Installers, Technicians and Engineers stationed in nearly 1000 locations worldwide to serve you.

The PC Huck Finn without the ‘N’ Word

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

Huck and Jim

Here is the latest Media Absurdity, New South Books wants to rewrite the history of the old south. I guess that’s why the publisher is named ‘New South’ books.

Recently, South Books informed the world that that they will remove the ‘n’-word from their upcoming republication of Mark Twain’s classic, “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn”.

I consider it crude raw unabated censorship, an infringement of our unique American right to freedom of speech, and a gross distortion of Twain’s view of the world as it existed in his day.

Twain’s wrote about a time when slavery existed in America. Slavery at the time of Twain was ugly and at times downright evil. The rawest racist language of his day is highlighted by all the characters in his books.
Twain got it right a century and a quarter ago by creating the character Huck Finn. Huck Finn’s use the n-word with other crude racial epithets was Twain’s protest against racial bigotry.

Twain conveyed the sentiment that was part of America’s horrid racial legacy. Had Twain sugar coated the language he painted a real world scene instead of some wizzard of oz fantasy.

Huck Finn’s ugly language provides perhaps the most realistic insight to life as an American slave. To Remove the ‘n’ word would be hypocritical.

Like Charles Dickens from a quarter century earlier, what make Twain and Dickens great was their ability to write about the real world with all its cruelty and goodness. They brought to readers minds, the injustice in society buy building such believable characters. Their language was and  is the first step in curing social injustice.

Yes Huck Finn’s ugly language was mean and ugly, yet it provided perhaps the most real insight to life as an American slave. To remove the ‘n’ word would be hypocritical in my opinion.

Today’s standard of PC, political correctness, is a far bigger absurdity than Twain’s use of the n-word. Keep the n-word in Huck Finn so generations from now will learn from a world that was more real than any other documentation that existed in the day.

Let’s never forget man’s cruelty to man, let’s never forget the words of Huck Finn and Jim.

SMBnow.com is news of, for and by SMBs!
SMBnow.com… The Small & Medium Business Magazine!

There is no Free Speech at NPR

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

All Things Considered? Really? Does the NPR, the National Public Radio allow free speech by all its radio personalities? The answer is NO! and the evidence is the firing of Juan Williams for speaking his mind. 

Juan Williams was fired by NPR over this remark, “…when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”

Mr. Williams was clearly expressing his personal reservations about the subject matter, not making an anti-Muslim remark of any sort. Williams’ comment was not about Muslims directly, it was more how he deals with his bias. Yet NPR didn’t see it that way.

“His remarks on The O’Reilly Factor this past Monday were inconsistent with our editorial standards and practices, and undermined his credibility as a news analyst with NPR,” the NPR statement read.

Editorial Standards? Really
Is this what NPR has become? An editoral staff that is so strict that their employees cannot express an opinion without retaliation? I fail to see how Mr. Williams remarks compromises the “editorial standards’ of NPR.


NPR has no ‘public’ standards anyway, just an liberal agenda that only tolerates attacks on conservative values. NPR that once ran an editorial cartoon titled, “How To Speak Tea Bag,” yes its ok to attack some groups.  Terry Gross’s NPR radio show is nothing but a Christian bashing, show that makes any Christian sound like an illiterate hate group.  Also Daniel Shorr, Nina Totenberg, Diane Rheim, Scott Simon may as well be paid consultants of the Democratic party.

Not Public Radio
NPR needs a name change because they don’t really represent the views of the public. There is nothing ‘national’ or ‘public’ about a radio station that has ‘control’ over its employees right to free speech at this level. It really Not Public Radio its Nasty Private Radio.

Racism is Alive At NPR …Let’s keep it a Secret
As of today, NPR is officially a ‘racist’ radio station because it fired African-American, Juan Williams for stating his opinion. If Fox fired Williams for remarks, this would be a headline story.

Stop Funding NPR
It way beyond time to stop funding NPR with public money. Lets change the name to National Progressive Radio. US tax dollars should absolutely NOT be going to fund what for years has been a cathedral for the “progressive” speak.  Maybe its time to start talking about implementing the Fairness Doctrine to NPR.  Its time for NPR to try to survive on its own in the free market. Write your state and federal representatives and demand that NPR’s federal funding be removed and used to reduce our federal budget deficit.

Rentacomputer.com offers a full range of iPad Rentals. Get yours today by visiting www.rentacomputer.com or by calling 800-736-8772.

Kill Cracker Babies

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusby feather

At a festival celebrating African heritage racist, King Samir Shabazz sputs hatred toward, as he puts it, crackers, a slang term for white people.


There is virturally no tv coverage of this with the exception of Fox News despite the fact that the self proclaimed ‘king’ of the New Black Panther Party is telling his mostly African American audience to kill white people and their babies for freedom.

“Kill all the White People, Kill Cracker Babies and I Hate White People, every iota of a cracker.” – quotes from King Samir Shabazz

Is this not news made by a political person from a political party?

Is it because the DOJ in bed with the Black Panther party that the major TV network news programs don’t even mention King Simir Shabazz.

King Samir Shabazz is the gentlemen who was carrying the billie club and threatening white people at a public polling place (video below). The King provided Obama with support via violence and intimidation against white people so they wouldn’t vote for the white candidate.


Yet despite the video evidence, the DOJ has dropped the federal lawsuit against the New Black Panthers for ‘purely racial reason’ according to former DOJ attorney J. Christian Adams.

So now we have a possible corrupt DOJ, a Racist spewing hate speech and yet we have almost no real coverage of these anti-white person events.

Now throw in Malik Shebazz, the Black Panther Chairman who can be summed up as saying that killing white babies is ok, as long as it is in context. Chairman Malik refuses to say what ‘context’ is acceptable for killing white babies.

Hate speech is only covered in one direction. If you want to hear all the tv news you have to include Fox News in your daily lineup of tv news sources. Otherwise you are missing a large segment of what is going on in this country.

How absurd that only one network news channel covers the anti-white news.

Other Suggested Reading:

SMB: Sam’s Club offering SBA backed Loans for SMBs